![]() ![]() What are your thoughts on what tweaks could be done to make this implementation even better. Am I crazy, am I missing anything or do you have any thoughts on using masks to replicate sub pixels and what results could be gained from that. This would draw the image on the screen closer to how a real CRT would. If everything scales the right way the mask should end up targeting the given pixels 1-1 where each sub pixel from the mask matches up with the pixel from the signal. ![]() This technique would only seem to work at targeted resolution scales. Should replicate the sub pixels of a PVM / Trinitron almost perfectly if the masks worked in that way and if you were doing a 3x 720 scale image.įurthermore if you wanted to add scanlines to that you could just add a black bar on every third pixel. The only way to get this is if the mask works in reverse Where when you have red green and blue masks it takes the respective value of the pixel behind it and displays only that color. CRT masks are made up of sub pixels, which are directed by the mask to each sub pixel by the beam so if you zoom in on a bright green object you would see green pillars surrounded by black sub pixels for the Red and blue respectively. Right now the way it seems to work is it tint the pixels with whatever value the mask is however I think there is a better way forward. Right now we have have the new shadow masks, however I think with a few tweaks we can do better.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |